May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar

May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is a great alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For that reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.

By vapinger.com calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into your mouth, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.

Along with the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.